A listing of complaints which resulted in action from 2003 onwards is presented below. You will also find Citations issued or Notice of Hearings.
Discipline Digest set out details of specific cases together with the final disposition. This serves to:
- Inform and educate members as well as the public; and
- Fulfill our duty as a self-regulating profession to demonstrate accountability and transparency.
2023
2023
| Year | File Number & PDF Link | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | CITATION — JANUARY 4, 2023 | In accordance with the College Bylaws and the Professional Governance Act the Investigation Committee has issued the following citation. |
Years 2021 to 2022
Years 2021 to 2022
| Year | File Number & PDF Link | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | File 022-06 | |
| 2022 | File 022-05 | |
| 2022 | File 022-04 | |
| 2022 | File 022-03 | |
| 2022 | File 022-02 | |
| 2022 | File 022-01 | |
| 2022 | HEARING RESULTS | Please be advised that a Discipline Panel of the College of Applied Biology made a determiniation with regards to allegations of professional misconduct against former member Shawna Reed, who resigned her membership effective January 1, 2021. The hearing proceeded by way of written submissions, and the allegations were set out in the Notice of Hearing dated June 11, 2021 and the citations posted in 2021. The Panel’s written reasons are published below. |
| 2021 | File 021-08 | |
| 2021 | File 021-07 | |
| 2021 | File 021-06 | |
| 2021 | File 021-04 | |
| 2021 | File 021-03 | |
| 2021 | NOTICE OF HEARING – JUNE 11, 2021 | Please be advised that on June 11, 2021, a Discipline Panel of the College of Applied Biology will convene to begin deliberations with regards to allegations of professional misconduct against former member Shawna Reed, who resigned her membership effective January 1, 2021. This hearing is proceeding by way of written submissions, and the allegations are set out in the Notice of Hearing below and the citations already posted. The Panel’s written reasons will be published here when available. |
| 2021 | File 021-02 | |
| 2021 | File 021-01 | |
| 2021 | CITATION – FEBRUARY 11, 2021 | In accordance with the College Bylaws and previous College of Applied Biology Act and Rules, the Discipline Committee has issued the following citation. |
Years 2016 to 2020
Years 2016 to 2020
| Year | File Number & PDF Link | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | File 20-02 | |
| 2020 | CITATION – OCTOBER 26, 2020 | In accordance with the College of Applied Biology Act and Rules, the Discipline Committee has issued the following citation. |
| 2020 | File 20-01 | |
| 2019 | File 19-05 | |
| 2019 | File 19-04 | |
| 2019 | File 19-03 | |
| 2019 | File 19-02 | |
| 2018 | DISCIPLINE PANEL DECISION REGARDING OCTOBER 24, 2017 CITATION | In accordance with the College of Applied Biology Act & Rules, a discipline hearing panel established under s. 28 of the Act (the “Panel”) convened on June 11, 2018 to inquire into allegations that the Respondent breached provisions of the College’s Member Code of Ethics, which is Schedule 2 of the Rules of the College. The College received the signed decision on December 6, 2018. |
| 2018 | File 18-04 | |
| 2018 | File 18-02 | |
| 2018 | File 18-01 | |
| 2017 | CITATION OCTOBER 24, 2017 | In accordance with the College of Applied Biology Act and Rules, the Discipline Committee has issued the following citation. |
| 2017 | File 017-11 | |
| 2017 | File 017-10 | |
| 2017 | File 017-09 | |
| 2017 | File 017-08 | |
| 2017 | File 017-07 | |
| 2017 | File 017-06 | |
| 2017 | File 017-05 | |
| 2017 | File 017-04 | |
| 2017 | File 017-03 | |
| 2017 | File 017-02 | |
| 2017 | File 017-01 | |
| 2016 | File 016-03 | |
| 2016 | File 016-02 | |
| 2016 | File 016-01 |
Years 2011 to 2016
Years 2011 to 2016
| Year | File Number & PDF Link |
|---|---|
| 2015 | File 015-04 |
| 2015 | File 015-03 |
| 2015 | File 015-02 |
| 2015 | File 015-01 |
| 2014 | File 014-03 |
| 2014 | File 014-02 |
| 2014 | File 014-01 |
| 2013 | File 013-02 |
| 2013 | File 013-01 |
| 2012 | File 012-05 |
| 2012 | File 012-02 |
| 2012 | File 012-01 |
| 2011 | File 011-03 |
| 2011 | File 011-02 |
| 2011 | File 011-01 |
Years 2006 to 2010
Years 2006 to 2010
| Year | File Number & PDF Link |
|---|---|
| 2010 | File 010-04 |
| 2010 | File 010-03 |
| 2010 | File 010-02 |
| 2010 | File 010-01 |
| 2009 | File 009-03 |
| 2009 | File 009-02 |
| 2009 | File 009-01 |
| 2008 | File 008-04 |
| 2008 | File 008-03 |
| 2008 | File 008-02 |
| 2008 | File 008-01 |
| 2007 | File 007-02 |
| 2007 | File 007-01 |
| 2006 | File 006-02 |
| 2006 | File 006-01 |
Years 2003 to 2005
Years 2003 to 2005
| Year | File Number & PDF Link |
|---|---|
| 2005 | File 005-06 |
| 2005 | File 005-05 |
| 2005 | File 005-04 |
| 2005 | File 005-03 |
| 2005 | File 005-02 |
| 2005 | File 005-01 |
| 2004 | File 004-02 |
| 2004 | File 004-01 |
| 2003 | File 003-02 |
| 2003 | File 003-01 |
The College of Applied Biologists regulates over 3,300 licensed biology professionals and ensures registrants are held accountable for their practice and conduct. The College reviews all complaints submitted, operates a fair and equitable investigation process, and has the authority to use a variety of remedies in response to complaints.
Process Notice
The Investigations Committee meets every two months to review complaints and the College prioritizes procedural fairness and thorough investigation when addressing complaints. Please be aware that the process can sometimes last several months.
Please learn more about the process below, and use the form on this page if you wish to proceed to lodge a complaint.
The Complaint Process
How to Submit a Complaint to the College
Note: If you have questions or concerns about a College registrant’s conduct or practice, a good first step is to talk to the individual. You may be able to resolve the issue by discussing your concerns.
Actions that constitute submission of a complaint
Per section 66 of the Professional Governance Act and Division 9, Part 2, section 9-3, (1) of the College bylaws:
- Professional misconduct
- Conduct unbecoming of a registrant, or
- Incompetent performance of duties undertaken while engaged in the registrant’s regulated practice
What are examples of complaints that do not fall under the College’s jurisdiction?
- Commercial disputes (unless the nature of the dispute indicates a possible breach of the Professional Governance Act and College bylaws)
- Complaints against companies or organizations to which College registrants may belong
- Complaints that pertain to or involve an act, regulation and/or policy and its associated process(es) which are outside the College’s statutory jurisdiction
- Complaints against individuals who are not registrants of the College
The College’s Investigation Committee reviews complaints against registrants for failure to meet their professional and ethical obligations as set out in:
The College will review all complaints received.
Confidentiality and the College Investigation Process
The Professional Governance Act and College bylaws require that the College keep information about any ongoing investigation confidential. This is communicated to all parties at the beginning and during the investigation process.
After a Complaint is Submitted
What happens when the College receives a complaint submission?
- The complainant will receive an acknowledgement (mail or electronic) regarding the complaint.
- The complaint will be reviewed by the Registrar, who:
- Will within 10 days inform the CEO and Investigation Committee that a complaint has been received
- Will review the complaint to determine if it falls within the jurisdiction of the College
- If the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the College, the Registrar must take action that includes one or more of the following:
- Request more information from the complainant and/or respondent
- Refer the complaint to a practice review
- Refer the complaint to the Investigation Committee
- Dismiss the complaint pursuant to sections 9-5 and 9-6 of the College bylaws
Note: Reviewing information can take time and this may involve multiple submissions from both parties and from investigators.
What are the potential actions available to the Investigation Committee in response to a complaint submission?
- Request further information from the respondent and/or the complainant
- Authorize an investigation per section 66 of the Professional Governance Act for:
- Professional misconduct
- Conduct unbecoming of a registrant
- Incompetent performance of duties undertaken while engaged in the registrant’s regulated practice
- Authorize a practice review to be executed by the Audit and Practice Review Committee
- Issue a disciplinary action according to the list below
- Dismiss the complaint
Remedial Action
What types of remedies can the Investigation Committee pursue in response to a complaint?
The Investigation Committee may implement the following sanctions pursuant to section 72 of the Professional Governance Act:
- Reprimand or remedial action by consent (RRAC)*
- Consent order**
- Alternative complaint resolution (ACR)***
- Issue a citation, transferring the complaint file to the Discipline Committee
* The RRAC is defined in Part 9, division 2, section 9-16 of the College bylaws
** The consent order is defined in Part 9, division 2, section 9-17 of the College bylaws
*** The ACR is defined in Part 9, division 2, section 9-18 of the College bylaws
What types of remedies can the Discipline Committee pursue once a citation is issued by the Investigation Committee?
The Discipline Committee may take the following actions pursuant to section 75 of the Professional Governance Act:
- Appoint a Discipline Panel
- The Discipline Panel presides over a discipline hearing and provides a decision to the Discipline Committee based on materials presented during the hearing
- Prescribe the procedures for a discipline hearing
- Determine if a hearing will be in-person, oral or written
- In place of a hearing, pursue an alternative remedy (RRAC, ARC, etc.) as listed above
- Dismiss the complaint
For any questions regarding the investigations process, please contact the College office at (250) 383-3306 or email registrar@cab-bc.org.
Submit a Complaint Form
Submit a Complaint Webform
Submit Complaint By Mail
Alternatively, complaints can be submitted by mail using the mail-in Complaint Form. Attach the details of your complaint and any evidence to the form and mail to:
Attention: Registrar, College of Applied Biologists
#310 – 1207 Douglas St.
Victoria, BC
V8W 2E7
Complaints must include an identified contact person as the complainant. For any questions or assistance with submitting a complaint, contact the College office at (250) 383-3306.
Complaints & Discipline FAQs
How are complaints dealt with?
All complaints about registrants are reviewed. Many can be resolved at the investigation stage and others may ultimately be sent to a Discipline Panel. The Investigation Committee, the body charged with reviewing complaints, consists of registrants of the College and members of the public. The Committee reviews and discusses all material submitted about the complaint.
What happens when the College receives your complaint submission?
- You will receive an acknowledgement (mail or electronic) regarding your complaint.
- Your complaint will be reviewed by the Registrar to determine if the subject registrant is/was a registrant with the College during the time of the alleged infraction.
- If the subject of the complaint was a registrant with the College at the time of the alleged infraction, the complaint will be forwarded to the Investigation Committee within 30 business days.
- You may be contacted if further information is required by the Discipline Committee. (Note: Ensuring that all information is available to the Discipline Committee can take time as this may involve submissions from both parties and sometimes a separate investigation).
Depending on the findings of Investigation Committee, the following outcomes are possible:
- Dismissal of the complaint
- Dismissal of the complaint with a letter of advice
- Reach a Conditional Admission with the subject registrant
- Issue a Citation to the subject registrant, convene a Discipline Panel and proceed to a Discipline Hearing (Note: At this time, the subject registrant’s name and nature of the alleged infraction will be published on Discipline Digest page of the College website)
At any point in the Investigations process, the subject registrant may agree to an alternative complaints resolution (ACR) prescribed by the registrar, Investigation Committee or Discipline Committee as applicable.
What will be the penalties for corporations that knowingly violate the best practices methods to protect the environment? The Northwest Transmission Line is a perfect example of these violations.
This is out of scope for firm regulation.
— OSPG staff
When is it necessary to report significant harm and how are reports reviewed for veracity?
The Professional Governance Act section 58 requires registrants to report the practice of an identified registrant when there is reasonable and probable grounds to believe that the identified registrant’s practice may pose a risk of significant harm to the environment or to the health and safety of the public or group of people. This reporting duty extends to an employer or partner of an identified registrant when employment or partnerships are impacted because of the risk of harm from the identified registrant’s practice.
For clarity, the s. 58 duty to report is not meant to require registrants to raise concerns to regulatory bodies about risk of significant harm arising from government policies or authorization decisions a registrant may be operating under. There are other mechanisms for registrants and others to bring these types of concerns to the authority having jurisdiction.
Regulatory bodies must treat a report under s.58 as a complaint to the regulatory body by:
- Following the general complaint process
- Ensuring there is a process to triage and prioritise given the potential risk of significant harm to the environment or health and safety of the public (as appropriate, may draw upon the extraordinary measures to protect the public).
- Considering whether another authority having jurisdiction should be notified.
- Notifying other authorities if appropriate.
— OSPG staff
Will there be additional guidance with respect to our duty to report other professionals under the PGA?
Further information regarding duty to report can be found on the OSPG website.
What if I have a problem with a registrant of the College?
If you believe a registrant of the College — or a registrant of any other regulator under the Professional Governance Act — has contravened the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, you should submit a complaint to the College by completing and submitting the complaint form.